'You see this stuff out of France. There're some aggressive, angry emotions'
If Mr Armstrong is so worried about his safety maybe he could consider retiring,
he had his days of glory, let the younger generation take over, what is he trying
to prove! furthermore with comments like that he is not building bridges but stirring
bad feelings, we dont need this kind of Ambassador...........
frosty.. I agree that he should retire.
What is Lance trying to prove at this stage of his life? That he can still ride a bike?
He should just leave the hornets nest alone. The French anti-doing groups will find something to pin on him.
Lance you won 7 in a row.. What do you need an 8th title for? If you don't win it, everyone will be questioning your 7!
Please, Mr. Armstrong, get over yourself!
Pure and simple, can't stand not being the center of attention. Come on, Make a calender or something! Geezus!
I too am sick of Lance Armstrong. Talk about someone who can't let go.
The reason he broke up with Sheryl Crow was because he was no longer in the spotlight.
Give it up Lance - your yesterday's news.
What a crybaby bore
Hey Lance: if you're afraid, then don't go!
People did not like Lance from 1999 to 2006 and nothing happened to him then. For all he says about French spectators, whether or not they liked him, they respected him as a rider. No rider has ever been hurt on the Tour by spectators, even when caught with EPO in the pee jar.
Reality is that the Tour de France made Lance rich. He pretty much focused solely on the Tour while all other riders rode in all the tours and classics, just because of the media attention and advertising money it could bring him.
It now looks like he wants to suck out one last bit of attention from the Tour by claiming that his security is at risk. Pathetic! How do you win 7 Tours while being such a loser?
Lance, if you can no longer take the heat, get off the road... and if you are so sure about how clear your 1999 urine is, why don't you have it tested? You do not risk anything right? Or do you?
Eric, i'm afraid that there is a rider who has been hurt by a spectator. In 1975, the great Eddy Merckx was on his way to his 6th victory when he was punched hard in the liver by a spectator. This, together with a broken cheekbone from a fall cost him the victory.
Besides, if Merckx had concentrated on the tour the way armstrong has, he could have won at least 8 tours, if not 10.
Didn't something like this happen at a bicycle race in the last year or two also? I remember reading something about it-I don't remember, just not ont he top of my list of things to pay attention to-can't watch bicycle racing-something like watching paint dry and grass grow. It's just boring.
I think Lance is just trying to promote himself by creating some controversy about the upcoming race. He is trying to create some drama and suspense so people will pay attention, especially the press.
If he is not doping, then why did he pick Dr Michele ferrari as his personal physician? This docter openly states that anything that is not forbidden (yet) is not doping. Four of his other cyclists have been caught with doping, and yet armstrong claims to be clean.... This doctor mocks other sports docters as "punto's" (a cheap slow italian car). He's been convicted for administering forbidden products but he got of the hook because of a procedural glitch.
Also, from a doping point of view, it's ideal to concentrate on the tour only. Under the old rules, it gave you the rest of the year to prepare for the race, using any kind of doping you wanted.
Dr ferrari even openly admitted that francesco Moser, one of his athletes, was using blood doping when he broke the world hour record.
On top of that, armstrong was winning his races when just about every cyclist was taking EPO, or EPO-like but more advanced products which at the time could not be detected yet. During later tests on urine samples, the newspaper L'equipe reported that they found epo, but because they didn't use the proper procedure, the test was not valid according to tour regulations. Besides, how did armstrong manage to win when all other cyclists were forced to take epo or else at best be a mediocre cyclist?
I'm sorry lance, but preventively victimizing yourself won't help. The french are not pissed without a good reason, it's not all chauvinism. The days when only frenchmen won the tour are long gone. You have an attitude problem and an oversized ego, that's why so many people are so critical of you.
Hey buddy, when he was riding they were all doping! That's a fact! Try it yourself, jump on a bike, go to an elevation of nine thousand ft., with a grade of (lets make it easy Alpe D'Huez ave. grade is 7.9) 6 percent, and ride at 15 miles an hour for just 15 minutes. When you finish hacking up a lung and passing out, then you will know everyone would need, a little or a lot, help.
I agree that they were all doping, and that the permormance of even mediocre riders was almost superhuman. But why does armstrong want to maintain that he was just about the only one who was clean? Why do you think nobody believes his claims that he was clean?
Nike decides what the LIVE WRONG tool does. they own Lance Pharmastrong!
Lance has wrecked pro cycling an made it a total WWE joke. It was always drugged, corrupt and dishinest---but now yoy can understand how it is FIXED too!
Lance could not win a local road race without illegal drugs and 'Nike's promoter help'.
Yawn. Cow blood IVs, EPO, hGH, exogenous testosterone and steroids made Lance a fraud!
I am very glad after reading these posts, it just emphasize what I was thinking, the
man has an uncurable ego and a need for attention that points out to.........you can all fill
in the blanks.........
Nike tool LIVE WRONG (Nike's idea) Lance is a drug cheat. He injects steroids, hGH, insulin, EPO, corticosteroids, and other Polypharmacy (eg: cow blood IVs). He is a bald faced liar too, just like all Nike athletes (Marion Jones, Tim Montgomery, Justin Gatlin, Regina jacobs, Kelli White, Michelle Collins, Tori Edwards)
Nike decides what Lance does. Pharmstrong is a steroid sneaker salesman. The TDF has become WWE much like all ESPN sports (NFL, MLB, NBA). Doped and fixed for TV ratings.
Drugs help fuel TV profits.
Lance is going back for a good cause. Anything that can be done to promote cancer research should be encouraged. He is merely asking for a fair chance to compete. All of us old timers that are out there still on our bikes are pulling for him. Good luck Lance!
I agree with nickninty9 - if it generates more publicity and research $$'s for the war on cancer, which he has a very personal stake in, then more power to him. Even if he comes in last it would still be more than worth it if helps outs someone with cancer that is looking for inspiration to get through the pain. He may have an ego, but he is an amazing cyclist, has greatly expanded the fan base of his sport and he has the right to do as he pleases regardless of what the angry couch potatoes (see above) with too much time on their hands have to say about it. Good luck, Lance!!!
So everybody who doesn't believe that he's been riding clean is an angry couch potato with too much time on his hands? since when is that an argument?
i think armstrong would be a much better advocate for cancer research if he would not destroy his own credibility by refusing to test his old urine samples on epo or other products.
besides, he didn't do all that much for his sport: in europe he did not expand the fan base at all. He didn't even compete in the spring classics or in other important tours (the giro, the vuelta, tour of lombaria, etc).
to me , he's just not the kind of guy that i admire enough to make me devote more attention to cancer research. Somehow, you always get the feeling that everything he does is just a way to place himself in the spotlights.
Why does he keep coming up with phony arguments about doping? as long as he does that, it will be hard to believe him on anything.
The war on cancer is a fraud and not worth supporting. Why doesn't the American Cancer Society go after all the chemicals in our products and environment that CAUSE the cancer? Answer: because it's not PROFITABLE. Follow the money. The American Cancer Society is primarily interested in raising money and protecting the profits of Big Pharma and Medicine.
I would be too. He won seven tours and they think he cheated, not a good situation.
The one thing the tour organizers and the French people are forgetting is that when he won, everyone was doping. Why do you think the times are so slow now compared with years past? Clamping down on doping that's why. If he were French or from another country besides the US do you think they would hate him so much? This is the real question. They should let him ride and make it a new reality show like "Big Brother". Put camera's everywhere all the time and make sure someone is watching him 24/7. I'd watch that for sure!
Llorón!!!!
Lance is a Nike endorsed drug cheat. Another Marion Jones!
Good grief, can this guy just go away already. He is the most egotistical, self-promoting putz I have ever seen. All about Lance, and he doesn't care who or what he leaves in his wake...and the media continues to cover him as if he is still pertinent.....GO AWAY LANCE!!!!!
Lance has an advantage other riders don't have. Lance got surgically castrated to treat testicular cancer.
What that means is that Lance can legally (by the rules) receive testosterone supplementation, as long as he doesn't break a certain physiological level. Nobody else can get that.
The fact is that when men athletically perform to exhaustion, do not see testosterone levels maintained at the physiological peak. And all men have a cycle of highs and lows.
The fact is also, that as men age, their testosterone levels slowly drop. The level of a 20 year old is not the same as a guy at 35, or a guy at 45 or at 55. But Lance, because he was castrated, can legally maintain his testosterone levels at the peak that a 20 year old could have.
So, even if Lance is "clean" he isn't actually playing on the same field as the other players are. I don't think it is fair at this point for Lance to be competing. If his testosterone supplementation ceiling was cut to the level (year round) that men in his age group average? I guarantee you that Lance would no longer be a winner.
Don't get me wrong. Lance works hard, and he has gifts. But everyone works hard at the level of the Tour de France. So we should look carefully at his pharmacological supplements, and no, I do not think Lance's competing is fair.
This is unfair. first of all, he was not castrated: only one testicle was removed. Normally the remaining testicle can produce enough testosterone for an average man, but probably not for a top athlete. There is nothing dishonourable about compensating a lower testosterone level. besides, most cyclists have a high natural level of testosterone, otherwise they wouldn't make good cyclists.
If he has T levels that are that of a 20 yr old, why aren't the 20 yr old riders winning? Wouldn't that be a fair race? Face it, life is not always fair. The tour is just as much, if not more, about mental toughness and team riding, as physical ability. I played basketball when I was younger and I played against players that could run faster and jump higher than me but didn't have the same experience or understanding of the game that I had. The result was I won more games than they did. I was glad they didn't know the fundamentals of the game, otherwise I would have been in trouble.
If I were a competing rider against Lance I'd love the challenge of trying to beat him. I wish the riders and people could see that point.
I think it's a shame any athlete should be afraid to compete. If Armstrong has the desire then he should also have the opportunity. We all know he will be under the knife during the whole race so let the man race if he wants too, it's not like will be able to get away with anything under handed - so let him do his thing.
If he loses, then he loses, but if he wins - what a great accomplishment not only to himself as an athlete but to all those that doubted him!
I'm not a sports fan, just noticed my MSNB live feed and thought it looked interesting. From Mr. Armstrong's language, I think he's just saying it like it is. He's not grandstanding, but noting a problem that is probably real, since it can be easily verified, despite the rumor mills of yellow journalism. And he's totally right about the Kanagroo court....he or his lawyers aren't in possession of the same samples from that year, so how could anyone be sure of contamination by the French authorities. Anyone as a successful and savvy as Lance Armstrong would be negligent in not pointing out the possibilities of future problems so he doesn't appear to be panicky at the time it happens. ANYONE would want to do the same in an analogous situation
Im sorry but if he really thinks that the "French authorities" have no laws, then what was he doing there? In a murder trial, the prosecutor may possess the murder weapon. does that mean that the defender must have an exact copy of the murder weapon? Off course not. If this is his argument for refusing new tests, it's a very poor argument that basically means that France is a lawless corrupt country. If that's what he thinks, then what was he doing there??
When is he going to talk straight instead of giving us this kind of crap? He should have the B-samples tested under controlled circomstances, and then once and for all clear his name, or else bear the consequences. Since he's not willing to do so, he's only feeding the misgivings that most observers have about his career.
No, the defence doesn't need a copy of the murder weapon they just need to be 100% sure that the murder weapon hasn't been contaminated or planted on their defendant. These urine samples are 9 years old, do you not think it's possible that someone somewhere thought "hmm, let's add this tiny drop of EPO when we do the test..." I know people who run faster and longer than I ever could, 60 year olds who run full marathons when I would struggle with running a mile. People are different and some people are exceptional at what they do.
I wouldn't be happy with retesting if I were Lance just because you can't be sure it's handled legit because we all know governments are fair amirite?
Good Luck Lance! Use all of the negativity in today's world to propel you to finish 1st and with a smile.
GO USA!
Lance may be a good rider but he has never even tried to be friends with the French people...as compared to say, Greg Lemond. I'm not surei f he's doping or not.. but not riding because he doesn't feel safe sounds like a poor excuse to me!
Nike decides what their based tools do, NOT the athlete poser. Pharmstrong tested positive for illegal corticosteroid in July 1999, then flunked six more tests for EPO doping that very same 1999. And his USPO teammate Frankie Andreu confessed in the New York Time to EPO doping in that same race.
In the 2000 TDF Lance was busted for insulin, 160 spent sryinges and empty cow blood IV bags of Actovegin.
Lance is another Marion Jones! Sneaker sales promoted with steroids, lies and fixes.
S-T-E-R-O-I-D-S=Cheater
Illegal Drugs=Cheater
S-T-E-R-O-I-D-S=Cheater
Illegal Drugs=Cheater
what is this? it's ok to be a winner as long as you don't win too much? he's taken all the tests required to ride or he wouldn't even be eligible to compete! if he's not good enough to win, then someone else will defeat him. what possible right does someone else have to dictate that someone strong enough to compete must retire simply because others are tired of losing? people don't take "turns" in professional sports. the only people who "deserve" to win are the people physically able to do it at that moment in time. "what is he trying to prove"?! "why does he need an eighth title"? from the point of view of an athlete or even a sports fan, such questions are pointless at best and at worst they're almost obscene!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |